Custom Search
Top Stories
Go to Site Index See "Top Stories" main page
CONTRIBUTION · 11th April 2014
Ingo Oevermann
Dear Editor and people of Kitimat:

http://www.pv-tech.org/news/minnesota_rules_solar_most_cost_effective_resource_for_utility_xcel

On March 28th, 2014, an article by Lucy Woods appeared on the PV Tech site, entitled ĎMinnesota utilities commission upholds landmark solar versus gas rulingí. The link is shown above, but for those of you without a computer, I am quoting the significant part of the article: ďThe Minnesota Public Utilities Commission (PUC) has made a precedent-setting decision in ruling a proposed solar power project more economic than rival gas plants in meeting state utility Xcelís future power needs. The commission has upheld a previous landmark judicial decision at the end of last year that selected developer Geronimoís 100MW distributed solar energy project, a move that surprised many as the project was competing against five natural gas plants. Natural gas firms that lost against the solar project in the competitive bidding process then accused the overseeing judge of handling the process unfairly. The solar project will receive no subsidies, with solar systems fitted across 16 counties to save transmission and grid maintenance costs, while fulfilling Xcelís energy needs with clean solar energy.Ē

Even though this is minor compared to the growth in solar panel deployment in Europe, China, Japan and India, it should be a huge wake-up call to any government which may be pinning its financial future on natural gas or oil production. BCTVís news release on March 31st highlighted the realities and dangers Canada faces from escalating climate change. The rest of the world is working overtime to find sustainable solutions, while Canada appears to be dead last by continuing to peg its hopes on dirty fossil fuels. The full awareness of the cause of climate change is ricocheting around the planet, and Canada should not be too surprised to discover in 10 to 15 years that the world wants little or nothing to do with the dirty fossil fuels we have to offer. Minnesota is below Manitoba, and two states over from Michigan, where the people of Battle Creek and Kalamazoo are still reeling from the aftermath of the largest north American pipeline spill; Alaskaís Exxon Valdez disaster happened a very short 25 years ago, and by most accounts the area is still a dead zone. 800+ pipeline spills between 1999 and 2010 is an average of 53 spills per year (4 spills per month) and is a disgusting record of industrial carelessness.

It is high time for B.C. and Canada to embrace non-polluting alternative energy options, safe-guard its valuable agricultural lands, essential fresh ground water and river supplies, and sustainable sea food products. We are not going to achieve that by expanding our disease creating Atlantic fish farms, by building more leaky oil pipelines, by possible tanker accidents on our coast, or by polluting our clean ground waters and essential agricultural land with Ďfrackingí chemicals. Our leaders and us have been much too irresponsible for too long.

We needed to address the future yesterday.

Forty years ago we knew that every gallon of oil spilled on the ground contaminated 10,000 gallons of drinking water. Research since then has shown that itís not 10,000 gallons, not even 100,000 gallons but a million (1,000,000) gallons. At a low average value of $1.00 per gallon of good clean drinking water, that implies that the people of Michigan are owed 860,000 x 1,000,000 x $1.00 for a total of $860,000,000.00 ($860 billion). Thatís just for the water damage alone, never mind the loss of tourism, fresh water fish, agricultural land, and health impacts to be determined.

It is absolutely mind numbing to even contemplate a pipeline spill on one of the northern tributaries of the Fraser, the Morice/Bulkley/Skeena and the Kitimat rivers at the height of any salmon spawning run. That would be slightly stupider than someone winning $50 million dollars in the 649 and wasting it all at a Casino.

We, and our grandchildren can live about 5 minutes without air, about 5 days without water, and about 50 days without food. We canít eat non- existent vegetables, grains or fruit which wonít grow on oil contaminated land; we canít eat non-existent beef on non-existent oil contaminated pasture land; we canít eat fresh water fish which have been destroyed by oil and pipeline spills; and we canít eat ocean sea-food products that have been destroyed by crude oil tanker spills.

Mother Nature, and the Tooth Fairy, who are responsible for fixing all these things, are already overloaded. So itís up to you and me, together. This is the last frontier, and it is the ONLY home we have.

Thank you for your time and for caring. Ingo Oevermann, in outrageously beautiful and fragile Smithers, B.C.