NEWS RELEASE · 31st August 2010
Pipe Up Against Enbridge
Hundreds of northern B.C. residents rallied today outside the Riverlodge Recreation Centre in Kitimat, where the federal panel reviewing the controversial Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline conducted its first public meeting.
The crowd of local residents, including many First Nations from the region, say Enbridge's plan to transport tar sands oil through B.C. by pipeline and oil tanker is the wrong choice and should not be allowed to proceed.
“The opposition to this project is massive and growing every day,” the event's MC Gerald Amos from Kitamaat Village told the crowd. “We have drawn a line in the sand. There will be no Enbridge Pipeline and there will be no crude oil tankers in our waters. This is not a battle we intend to lose.”
In solidarity with the Kitimat rally, over 200 people also gathered outside Enbridge's Vancouver headquarters and marched to a rally at the Vancouver Art Gallery. Speakers at the event, including MPs Ujjal Dosanjh and Finn Donnelly pledged to work to put in place a legislated crude oil tanker ban for B.C.'s northern waters.
Community members at the event carried banners and placards. Several dressed as oil spill cleanup workers to remind the crowd of Enbridge's recent pipeline oil spill in Michigan.
“Due to the uncertainty associated with the transport of crude oil along our unpredictable northwest coast, the Village of Queen Charlotte has resolved that this project should not proceed,” said Kris Olsen, a municipal councillor with the Village of Queen Charlotte. “All Haida Gwaii municipalities stand together in opposition to Enbridge because the tradeoffs and risks involved are unacceptable.”
“Haida Gwaii is creating a sustainable economy that takes into consideration all environmental services when determining the value of a project. The Enbridge project threatens our economy and opportunities for future generations,” added Olsen.
Joy Thorkelson with the United Fishermen and Allied Workers Union expressed concern that an oil spill would harm important sectors of northern B.C.'s existing economy.
“For hundreds of years, the fisheries have been vital to our communities' economies and our way of life as coastal people, and we're not willing to put that at risk. The commercial fishing industry is the largest private sector employer on the central and north coast and a handful of oil jobs won't replace the importance of the fishery.”
Where is the "SOLIDARITY TO THE PRINCIP in OPOSING OIL"
Comment by Leon Dumstrey-Soos on 31st August 2010
Today I went to see River Lodge parking lot -of which you took a photo-it was full of cars-I WONDER IF THEY WERE ELECTRIC CARS?.
There was no proof of traditional way of traveling!
Those that are serious in protesting AGAINST OIL, could have at least parked their vehicles few km away Nechako Center or at least City Center to prove their "SERIOUS INTENT"... for a starter!!
Or why simply not STOP HERE TOTAL USAGE OF ANY AND ALL OIL PRODUCTS??
MP CULLEN by his admission is spending over a $200.000... a year for travel, by the end of his second term this will be close to $2mil,this is lot of CARBON!
WHY IS NO ONE PROPOSING AN OIL REFINERY??? BY PRODUCTS?
How many jobs would be Created??
Perhaps Gasoline is less dangerous to transport than AMONIA that has been shipped from Kitimat for almost 2 decades by ships!
US Pres. OBAMA in one of his speeches said that AFFORDABLE ALTERNATIVE ENERGY is 10-12 yrs away! SO WHAT DO THE OPOSERS PROPOSE FOR TIME BEING. Please help me out.
Transport of Gasoline is definitely-in my opinion- less dangerous than OIL or Ammonia!